![]() I hate the fact that this exists, and is even seen as normal by some people, but only good can come out of it being exposed like this. This is simultaneously depressing and encouraging. ![]() So we're gonna have one of these a week now? A number of issues had been commented on by Level and the other Battlefield youtubers he runs with. Some people reported problems with 780 cards, and some other issues, but it was a little more stable and kill trades seemed less, though that part is anecdotal. ![]() It even led to a funny story of a troll targeting another player trying to get footage and knifing him right as he was about to capture the big event.Īlso the beta, surprisingly, was in better condition than the game at launch when it came to crashes. To get footage of the ship crashing they specifically had to not kill each other over a couple of games because they were ending too early or the game would crash as the ship was about to hit. Up until the at home beta weren't these guys only allowed to play the game at shows and special events hosted by EA with pre-configured computers and capture cards? These were situations tailor-made to show the game at its best and LevelCap, JackFrags, Xfactor, and others did still report there were some crash issues especially with the Paracel Storm map. Link to FTC Policy Statement on Unfairness Link to Section 5 of the FTC Act - Unfair Methods Of Competition Unlawful 45) to the use of endorsements and testimonials in advertising." Link to the FTC Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising, which specifically "address the application of Section 5 of the FTC Act (15 U.S.C. However, I believe this is the same interpretation that the FTC gives to the law (as evidence by their creation of the guidelines). Law (though I have lived here for the majority of my life, and as such have a certain affinity and understanding of it.) I welcome anyone with better credentials (or anyone that can read, as a Law Degree is not required to do research) to revise my findings. While I am a Lawyer, I am neither trained in Common Law nor much less U.S. Now, I don't presume my reading of the situation is the correct one. Polygon's article claiming that the guidelines themselves are not legally enforceable is correct only in strict sense of that sentence: the guidelines themselves are not enforceable, but the material they are based on is. Furthermore, it is in this same section that we find mention of the $10,000 per infraction that was listed in the original Ars Technica article.ĭue to this, It seems quite clear to me that failure to disclose of contractual endorsement not only violates FTC Guidelines, by extension it also directly violates the FTC Act. It is my view that it falls directly under the ' deceptive acts' listed above. Seeing as these guides expound on the principles dictated in the law, and therefore must draw from it, it is my reading that this is the section the guides base themselves on to require advertisers to disclose monetary arrangements.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |